December 9, 2005 · 2:11 pm
↓ Jump to Comments

Ahmadenijad: “I saw a vision while I was at the UN”

Very important video.

And very dangerous: the speaker (a woman), hmm, looks like she understand people have voted this dangerous extermist:

We know: for pacific use only…
Cox&Forkum.

9 Comments

Filed under Uncategorized

9 responses to “Ahmadenijad: “I saw a vision while I was at the UN””

  1. Krishna109
    December 9, 2005 at 3:01 pm

    Thanks for posting this video. It is important that many people see this, so that they understand who we are dealing with. (I will post a link to it on my site, too).

    I consider myself to be a tolerant person. Whatever religious, spiritual, mystical beliefs a person has is usually OK with me, as long as they keep to themselves and leave other people alone.

    However, when they possess nukes, then it becomes another matter entirely. Ahmadenijad and his folowers are a danger to the entire world– let’s hope everyone realizes it before it is too late.

    Reply
  2. blueslord
    December 9, 2005 at 3:21 pm

    Let’s hope it, Krishna.

    Reply
  3. blueslord
    December 9, 2005 at 3:36 pm

    Oh, and thanks a lot for the link…

    Reply
  4. Pastorius
    December 9, 2005 at 5:24 pm

    I’m so glad you posted this. I didn’t know there was videotape of him making these claims.

    Reply
  5. JMJ
    December 9, 2005 at 5:58 pm

    blueslord,
    Thanks so much for the video.

    Frontline and more media need to do major stories on this. Word needs to get out.

    Being European/Spanish yourself(?), do you see any trend at all away from the appeasement mentality in Europe?

    Percentage-wise, how would you break down your immediate group of friends , et al? Spain as whole? Europe as a whole?

    Appeasers
    Middle of the Road
    The “Infidel” Resistance

    Reply
  6. blueslord
    December 10, 2005 at 2:28 am

    Hello Pastorius:

    I received it yesterday afternoon. I was amazed at what I saw: that people do not deserve a war, they deserve peace and progress. It’s a pity that this fool has won the elections.

    JMJ:

    Uff, that is a very difficult question. Whatever I speak with someone of this matter they just agree with me (and I do not tell them all, I do not want them to die of a heartstroke…>;ODDD). But 11/M have just terrified everyone here. A lot of people compare this situation with the previous one to 711. We have a traitor (Zapatero&Co), a Muslim (Mohamed VIth) and a denial of our own history, denial that is specially dramatic.

    The 11/M is nothing but clear: we had 113 suspects of which ONLY ONE is going to be tried. And CNI (that is, the Intelligence Agency) is investigating again the links between ETA and 11/M. Nothing is clear. Moreover, Zapatero was negotiating with ETA since 2000 (when Aznar was President).

    It’s a disaster, really.

    Reply
  7. blueslord
    December 10, 2005 at 2:31 am

    Sorry: I said: “the 11/M is nothing but clear”, and I should have said “the 11/M is nothing but unclear”

    I’m going to lose a train (and this time it’s not a joke >;ODDD)

    Reply
  9. blueslord
    December 10, 2005 at 10:31 am

    11/M are the Madrid bombings of 11/March/2004.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

Gravatar
WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. ( Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. ( Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. ( Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. ( Log Out /  Change )

Cancel

Connecting to %s