<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Another pro-terrorism film: V for Vendetta</title>
	<atom:link href="http://actuajihad.wordpress.com/2006/03/22/124/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://actuajihad.wordpress.com/2006/03/22/124/</link>
	<description>The Jihad from an Spanish point of view</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 21:39:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: GOD Bless George Bush &#38; The USA! &#187; Blog Archive &#187; &#8230; sex dolls in the US to George</title>
		<link>http://actuajihad.wordpress.com/2006/03/22/124/#comment-2268</link>
		<dc:creator>GOD Bless George Bush &#38; The USA! &#187; Blog Archive &#187; &#8230; sex dolls in the US to George</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2006 23:06:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://actuajihad.wordpress.com/2006/03/22/124/#comment-2268</guid>
		<description>[...] Another pro-terrorism film: V for Vendetta &#8221; The Anti-Jihad Pundit From the Counterterrorism Blog: What are the Warner Brothers studio and parent &#8230; Bush _ s War Riddled with Flaws. From &#8220;Victims of Society &#8221; to Menace to Society &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Another pro-terrorism film: V for Vendetta &#8221; The Anti-Jihad Pundit From the Counterterrorism Blog: What are the Warner Brothers studio and parent &#8230; Bush _ s War Riddled with Flaws. From &#8220;Victims of Society &#8221; to Menace to Society &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zdkm</title>
		<link>http://actuajihad.wordpress.com/2006/03/22/124/#comment-1928</link>
		<dc:creator>zdkm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Aug 2006 00:44:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://actuajihad.wordpress.com/2006/03/22/124/#comment-1928</guid>
		<description>I have never read so much right wing diatribe in my life. How I found this site I don&#039;t remember, but I won&#039;t be back.

P.S. this is one of the best movies I&#039;ve seen in a long while. Viva la Revolution!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have never read so much right wing diatribe in my life. How I found this site I don&#8217;t remember, but I won&#8217;t be back.</p>
<p>P.S. this is one of the best movies I&#8217;ve seen in a long while. Viva la Revolution!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob</title>
		<link>http://actuajihad.wordpress.com/2006/03/22/124/#comment-1888</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2006 14:59:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://actuajihad.wordpress.com/2006/03/22/124/#comment-1888</guid>
		<description>The only people that call this a pro-terrorist movie are extreme right-wingers, i wonder why that is? For Gods sake,It&#039;s just a movie with lots of explosions! (like countless others before it) except better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only people that call this a pro-terrorist movie are extreme right-wingers, i wonder why that is? For Gods sake,It&#8217;s just a movie with lots of explosions! (like countless others before it) except better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob</title>
		<link>http://actuajihad.wordpress.com/2006/03/22/124/#comment-1887</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2006 14:56:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://actuajihad.wordpress.com/2006/03/22/124/#comment-1887</guid>
		<description>The only people that call this a pro-terrorist movie are right-wingers who are affraid of the masses waking from their slumber. Apart from that, it&#039;s just a movie with lots of explosions (like countless others) except better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only people that call this a pro-terrorist movie are right-wingers who are affraid of the masses waking from their slumber. Apart from that, it&#8217;s just a movie with lots of explosions (like countless others) except better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: black_lung</title>
		<link>http://actuajihad.wordpress.com/2006/03/22/124/#comment-1196</link>
		<dc:creator>black_lung</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jun 2006 17:00:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://actuajihad.wordpress.com/2006/03/22/124/#comment-1196</guid>
		<description>V for Vendetta is neither pro-terrorist nor anti-christian.  The film is on the one hand a study on the abuses of power - the corruption of the cross is an echo of the Nazi party&#039;s use of the Swastika, which had originally been used by Hindus and Buddhists, as well as many other groups and societies - that are possible when governments are not kept in check, and on the other hand an exploration of the delineation between a terrorist and a revolutionary.  Though V is ostensibly the &#039;hero&#039; of the film, it is made clear that his thirst for revenge makes him unstable.  The real heroes are revealed at the end of the film, as hundreds of normal everyday people take to the streets in defiance of the government, reasserting the idea that governments should be by and for the people, and never anything more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>V for Vendetta is neither pro-terrorist nor anti-christian.  The film is on the one hand a study on the abuses of power &#8211; the corruption of the cross is an echo of the Nazi party&#8217;s use of the Swastika, which had originally been used by Hindus and Buddhists, as well as many other groups and societies &#8211; that are possible when governments are not kept in check, and on the other hand an exploration of the delineation between a terrorist and a revolutionary.  Though V is ostensibly the &#8216;hero&#8217; of the film, it is made clear that his thirst for revenge makes him unstable.  The real heroes are revealed at the end of the film, as hundreds of normal everyday people take to the streets in defiance of the government, reasserting the idea that governments should be by and for the people, and never anything more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eurabian News &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Recomendación</title>
		<link>http://actuajihad.wordpress.com/2006/03/22/124/#comment-202</link>
		<dc:creator>Eurabian News &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Recomendación</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Apr 2006 23:56:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://actuajihad.wordpress.com/2006/03/22/124/#comment-202</guid>
		<description>[...] En The Anti-Jihad Pundit: Another Pro-Terrorism Film: V de Vendetta. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] En The Anti-Jihad Pundit: Another Pro-Terrorism Film: V de Vendetta. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Anti-JIhad Pundit</title>
		<link>http://actuajihad.wordpress.com/2006/03/22/124/#comment-195</link>
		<dc:creator>The Anti-JIhad Pundit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Apr 2006 17:45:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://actuajihad.wordpress.com/2006/03/22/124/#comment-195</guid>
		<description>Robert:

Thanks for your comment, but I do not think that you have understood what I was trying to tell here.

Firstly, the situation that the film depicts has nothing to do with the WWII. In fact, there is no war nor occupation by foreign powers or countries as happened in France with the Nazis.

Secondly, the problem is the legitimate power and the Fascists Government that the film describes. You know, Spain was a fascist government during Franco&#039;s dictatorship and normally foreigners tend to call ETA as &quot;freedom fighters&quot;. Well, in my case, I just cannot think them as such just because when Democracy came they did not stop the terrorists attacks, what is more they began a great campaign of more hurtful attacks and when the international community should have helped Spanish, it did nothing and in some cases, such as France, it directly supported -although unofficially- the Basque terrorists. In Spain, the south of France was called &quot;ETA sanctuary&quot;, till mid-90&#039;s.

But I am in this case critisizing more the depiction that the Pro-terrorist smelling that the film itself has: I mean, we have seen the case of Abdul Rahman in Afghanistan -and it&#039;s not the same- where it was a Muslim converted to Christianity the one who has been nearly killed because of his religion. What is more, in Iran and Saudi Arabis, homosexuals are killed JUST NOW just because of being homosexuals.

What is more, I find particularly offensive that they are using the most important symbol of Christianity -the Cross- as a political symbol of a Fascist Government. If some people have seen as normal the terrible consequences of the Mohammed Cartoons, why they are so understanding with people who insult Christians? -and I say Christians, because this is insulting for ALL Christians-. And of course it has the necessary tone of anti-Americanism because USA is just in the middle of a Civil War. It just has all the Leftist topics: America is a mess, Christianity is rubbish and Muslims are peaceful and respect the human rights -when the only coutnries in the world who have specially designed human rights for their religion are Muslim, in which they maintain that Sharia is superior to any other law-.

You know, I think the problem is that the fantasies of some people has nothing to do with reality but are depicted as a very good analysis of it. I think this film is a little bit as Syriana, because how many Muslim head of State have been killed by Western services? Hmm, NONE. 

Lastly, the own end of the film, when they explode the British Parliament is more that a symbol. Britain is the place where Democracy was born. So you would say: well, in the film is a fascist state. And I ask you: weren&#039;t there any other solution to end up Fascism than to blow up the Parliament? And it&#039;s also amazing that the author of the novel has complained about the BAD film they have done with it. In fact in the novel V is a foolish type, that is, a person with a mental illnes while here is just a &quot;freedom fighter&quot;. Oh, for me, Gandhi or Pope John Paul II are a freedom fighter. People who fight for individual and social freedom with their heart and soul, but with no violence.

It&#039;s curious that the fil is located in Britain, though. A country where people shouting &quot;behead people who insult Islam&quot; where not directly detained -in fact, they were detained several weeks after and not all of them-. And a Muslim carriyng some of the Mohammed cartoons was detained directly in a demonstration for the freedom of expression...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robert:</p>
<p>Thanks for your comment, but I do not think that you have understood what I was trying to tell here.</p>
<p>Firstly, the situation that the film depicts has nothing to do with the WWII. In fact, there is no war nor occupation by foreign powers or countries as happened in France with the Nazis.</p>
<p>Secondly, the problem is the legitimate power and the Fascists Government that the film describes. You know, Spain was a fascist government during Franco&#8217;s dictatorship and normally foreigners tend to call ETA as &#8220;freedom fighters&#8221;. Well, in my case, I just cannot think them as such just because when Democracy came they did not stop the terrorists attacks, what is more they began a great campaign of more hurtful attacks and when the international community should have helped Spanish, it did nothing and in some cases, such as France, it directly supported -although unofficially- the Basque terrorists. In Spain, the south of France was called &#8220;ETA sanctuary&#8221;, till mid-90&#8217;s.</p>
<p>But I am in this case critisizing more the depiction that the Pro-terrorist smelling that the film itself has: I mean, we have seen the case of Abdul Rahman in Afghanistan -and it&#8217;s not the same- where it was a Muslim converted to Christianity the one who has been nearly killed because of his religion. What is more, in Iran and Saudi Arabis, homosexuals are killed JUST NOW just because of being homosexuals.</p>
<p>What is more, I find particularly offensive that they are using the most important symbol of Christianity -the Cross- as a political symbol of a Fascist Government. If some people have seen as normal the terrible consequences of the Mohammed Cartoons, why they are so understanding with people who insult Christians? -and I say Christians, because this is insulting for ALL Christians-. And of course it has the necessary tone of anti-Americanism because USA is just in the middle of a Civil War. It just has all the Leftist topics: America is a mess, Christianity is rubbish and Muslims are peaceful and respect the human rights -when the only coutnries in the world who have specially designed human rights for their religion are Muslim, in which they maintain that Sharia is superior to any other law-.</p>
<p>You know, I think the problem is that the fantasies of some people has nothing to do with reality but are depicted as a very good analysis of it. I think this film is a little bit as Syriana, because how many Muslim head of State have been killed by Western services? Hmm, NONE. </p>
<p>Lastly, the own end of the film, when they explode the British Parliament is more that a symbol. Britain is the place where Democracy was born. So you would say: well, in the film is a fascist state. And I ask you: weren&#8217;t there any other solution to end up Fascism than to blow up the Parliament? And it&#8217;s also amazing that the author of the novel has complained about the BAD film they have done with it. In fact in the novel V is a foolish type, that is, a person with a mental illnes while here is just a &#8220;freedom fighter&#8221;. Oh, for me, Gandhi or Pope John Paul II are a freedom fighter. People who fight for individual and social freedom with their heart and soul, but with no violence.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s curious that the fil is located in Britain, though. A country where people shouting &#8220;behead people who insult Islam&#8221; where not directly detained -in fact, they were detained several weeks after and not all of them-. And a Muslim carriyng some of the Mohammed cartoons was detained directly in a demonstration for the freedom of expression&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Samualson</title>
		<link>http://actuajihad.wordpress.com/2006/03/22/124/#comment-189</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Samualson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2006 03:26:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://actuajihad.wordpress.com/2006/03/22/124/#comment-189</guid>
		<description>In WWII we had French terrorist attacking the Nazi government so sometimes it is good to be pro-terrorism. I saw the movie and it was also pro Freedom. So sometimes terrorist are good guys.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In WWII we had French terrorist attacking the Nazi government so sometimes it is good to be pro-terrorism. I saw the movie and it was also pro Freedom. So sometimes terrorist are good guys.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C L O S E R &#187; Blog Archive &#187; C L O S E R - I for Islam, M for Matrix and V for Vendetta</title>
		<link>http://actuajihad.wordpress.com/2006/03/22/124/#comment-187</link>
		<dc:creator>C L O S E R &#187; Blog Archive &#187; C L O S E R - I for Islam, M for Matrix and V for Vendetta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Apr 2006 12:55:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://actuajihad.wordpress.com/2006/03/22/124/#comment-187</guid>
		<description>[...] The movie &#8216;V for Vendetta&#8217; seems to be a hit and has certainly received some attention at Muslim blogs and anti-islam, and &#8216;critical islam&#8217; blogs. The Anti-Jihad Pundit sees it as &#8216;another pro-terrorism film&#8216; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The movie &#8216;V for Vendetta&#8217; seems to be a hit and has certainly received some attention at Muslim blogs and anti-islam, and &#8216;critical islam&#8217; blogs. The Anti-Jihad Pundit sees it as &#8216;another pro-terrorism film&#8216; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eurabian News &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Noticias varias</title>
		<link>http://actuajihad.wordpress.com/2006/03/22/124/#comment-141</link>
		<dc:creator>Eurabian News &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Noticias varias</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Mar 2006 02:16:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://actuajihad.wordpress.com/2006/03/22/124/#comment-141</guid>
		<description>[...] Por cierto, van a hacer una pel&#237;cula sobre Cindy Sheehan y parece que la va a interpretar Susan Sarandon. Y hablando de cine, hice un comentario a la pel&#237;cula V de Vendetta, la nueva pel&#237;cula de los hermanos Wackowski -los de Matrix- queha sido calificada como de pro-terrorista y anti-cristiania. Seg&#250;n la pel&#237;cula, en el a&#241;o 2.025, habr&#225; una dictadura cristiana en Europa y se perseguir&#225; a los homosexuales y a los musulmanes. El s&#237;mbolo del Gobierno es un cruz ama&#241;ada y los planes de los dos &quot;simp&#225;ticos&quot; protagonistas pasan por volar el Parlamento brit&#225;nico. As&#237; que yo sigo ahorrando en cine.  En otro orden de cosas, el afgano Abdul Rahman convertido al Cristianismo, denunciado por su padre por ser un hijo &quot;indigno&quot; parece que va a ser liberado, despu&#233;s de una importante presi&#243;n internacional. Pero, aunque se le libere, se plantean dos cuestiones fundamentales: &#191;se volver&#225; a repetir? y &#191;se respetar&#225; su integridad f&#237;sica? Ya hay qui&#233;n le aconseja que se vaya del pa&#237;s. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Por cierto, van a hacer una pel&iacute;cula sobre Cindy Sheehan y parece que la va a interpretar Susan Sarandon. Y hablando de cine, hice un comentario a la pel&iacute;cula V de Vendetta, la nueva pel&iacute;cula de los hermanos Wackowski -los de Matrix- queha sido calificada como de pro-terrorista y anti-cristiania. Seg&uacute;n la pel&iacute;cula, en el a&ntilde;o 2.025, habr&aacute; una dictadura cristiana en Europa y se perseguir&aacute; a los homosexuales y a los musulmanes. El s&iacute;mbolo del Gobierno es un cruz ama&ntilde;ada y los planes de los dos &quot;simp&aacute;ticos&quot; protagonistas pasan por volar el Parlamento brit&aacute;nico. As&iacute; que yo sigo ahorrando en cine.  En otro orden de cosas, el afgano Abdul Rahman convertido al Cristianismo, denunciado por su padre por ser un hijo &quot;indigno&quot; parece que va a ser liberado, despu&eacute;s de una importante presi&oacute;n internacional. Pero, aunque se le libere, se plantean dos cuestiones fundamentales: &iquest;se volver&aacute; a repetir? y &iquest;se respetar&aacute; su integridad f&iacute;sica? Ya hay qui&eacute;n le aconseja que se vaya del pa&iacute;s. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Anti-Jihad Pundit</title>
		<link>http://actuajihad.wordpress.com/2006/03/22/124/#comment-116</link>
		<dc:creator>The Anti-Jihad Pundit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2006 08:33:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://actuajihad.wordpress.com/2006/03/22/124/#comment-116</guid>
		<description>No, I do not think so. I mean, from my point of view they are just trying to tell that the War on Terror will evolve into a Christian dictatorship.

Normal people -in Spain at least are not going to search for a subtle meaning, they are just going to see the film and to see Christians as the bad people and Muslims as the victims. With the consequences that that thing could have.

By the way, ALL religious dictatorships are just basically the same. The problem is that while the Koram states VERY clearly the notes for a Global Califate, in the rest of religions it&#039;s very hard to find something similar. And that is a real difference that it&#039;s not well explained in the movie.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, I do not think so. I mean, from my point of view they are just trying to tell that the War on Terror will evolve into a Christian dictatorship.</p>
<p>Normal people -in Spain at least are not going to search for a subtle meaning, they are just going to see the film and to see Christians as the bad people and Muslims as the victims. With the consequences that that thing could have.</p>
<p>By the way, ALL religious dictatorships are just basically the same. The problem is that while the Koram states VERY clearly the notes for a Global Califate, in the rest of religions it&#8217;s very hard to find something similar. And that is a real difference that it&#8217;s not well explained in the movie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Snorri Godhi</title>
		<link>http://actuajihad.wordpress.com/2006/03/22/124/#comment-107</link>
		<dc:creator>Snorri Godhi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2006 19:33:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://actuajihad.wordpress.com/2006/03/22/124/#comment-107</guid>
		<description>Maybe Britain in V for Vendetta could be seen as an allegory for Iran??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe Britain in V for Vendetta could be seen as an allegory for Iran??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
